WebSurvey by Textalk

1. The level of the course correlates with the description of the course
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).

Answers to this question:

8

1	0	0%
2	0	0%
3	0	0%
4	1	12.5%
5	5	62.5%
6	2	25%

2. The intended learning outcomes (ILOs) of the course were adequately explained
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).

Answers to this question:

8

1	1	12.5%
2	0	0%
3	0	0%
4	1	12.5%
5	6	75%
6	0	0%

3. There was a clear connection between the content, the intended learning outcomes as well as the examination of the course
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).

Answers to this question:

8

1	1	12.5%
2	0	0%
3	0	0%
4	3	37.5%
5	2	25%
6	2	25%

4. The course design facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).

Answers to this question:

8

1	1	12.5%
2	0	0%
3	0	0%
4	1	12.5%
5	5	62.5%
6	1	12.5%

5. The examination was focused on understanding and/or application of knowledge
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).

Answers to this question:

8

1	0	0%
2	0	0%
3	0	0%
4	0	0%
5	2	25%
6	6	75%

6. I achieved the intended learning outcomes
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).

Answers to this question:

8

1	0	0%
2	0	0%
3	1	12.5%
4	0	0%
5	5	62.5%
6	2	25%

7. The teachers facilitated the achievement of the intended learning outcomes in an adequate way
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).

Answers to this question:

8

1	1	12.5%
2	0	0%
3	0	0%
4	3	37.5%
5	2	25%
6	2	25%

8. How challenging was the course for you? For me the level of the course was:
(1=too low; 7=too high)

Answers to this question:

8

1	0	0%
2	0	0%
3	0	0%
4	6	75%
5	2	25%
6	0	0%
7	0	0%

9. I have received relevant feedback during the course
(1 = strongly disagree; 6= strongly agree).

Answers to this question:

8

1	0	0%
2	0	0%
3	0	0%
4	4	50%
5	2	25%
6	2	25%

10. This course has fulfilled my expectations of what ought to be a doctoral education course of high quality
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).

Answers to this question:

8

1	0	0%
2	0	0%
3	1	12.5%
4	1	12.5%
5	3	37.5%
6	3	37.5%

11. I was highly motivated in taking this course
(1= strongly disagree; 6= strongly agree)

Answers to this question:

8

1	0	0%
2	0	0%
3	0	0%
4	0	0%
5	1	12.5%
6	7	87.5%

12. I had sufficient prior knowledge to be able to fully participate in the course
(1= strongly disagree; 6= strongly agree)

Answers to this question:

8

1	1	12.5%
2	0	0%
3	1	12.5%
4	0	0%
5	3	37.5%
6	3	37.5%

13. I have contributed to and engaged in the course
(1=strongly disagree; 6= strongly agree)

Answers to this question:

8

1	0	0%
2	0	0%
3	0	0%
4	2	25%
5	3	37.5%
6	3	37.5%

14. The course has increased my knowledge of recent advances within my field, in related areas or in general science subjects
(1= strongly disagree; 6= strongly agree)

Answers to this question:

8

1	0	0%
2	0	0%
3	0	0%
4	3	37.5%
5	3	37.5%
6	2	25%

15. The course has increased my understanding of relevant research methodologies and techniques and their appropriate application within my research field
(1=strongly disagree; 6=strongly agree)

Answers to this question:

8

1	0	0%
2	2	25%
3	1	12.5%
4	4	50%
5	0	0%
6	1	12.5%

16. The course has increased my ability to critically analyse and evaluate research findings
(1= strongly disagree; 6= strongly agree).

Answers to this question:

8

1	0	0%
2	2	25%
3	0	0%
4	4	50%
5	2	25%
6	0	0%

17. Are there any parts of the course that have been excellent? Please describe in what way.

Answers to this question:

7

It was a good course overall.

Access to lecturers

Formatet, med mycket diskussioner har varit jättebra, mycket utrymme för att bilda nya kopplingar i sin förståelse. Det har också varit lagom långa dagar, man orkar vara tillräckligt koncentrerad hela tiden.

Historiskt perspektiv på ledarskapsforskning. Läsande av andras papper. Feedback på eget papper.

The teachers.

The examination task The Contact with the leaders of the course (the faculty)

The teachers were good and willing to help.

18. Are there any parts of the course that did not help you to achieve the intended learning outcomes? Please describe why not?

Answers to this question:

4

-

You never mention the ILOs, the evaluation is obsessed with them, this is in itself strange.

The seminars with different speakers were not very aligned and separate from each others.

I would have liked more focus on methodology, and more critical thinking.

19. Did the course cover the areas that you expected? If not what was missing?

Answers to this question:

4

YEs.

incremental review of a planned and executed reserach study within the field. How you do the handicraft.

Maybe more about methodology

Did miss something about research methodology special for this area.

20. Do you have any recommendations as to how the course could be further improved?

Answers to this question:

4

-

Se questions 18 and 19

Perhaps consider adding one lecture about methodology and have a seminar about critically analyzing methods in leadership research.

21. I would recommend this course to others enrolled in doctoral education

Answers to this question:

8

(1)	Yes	8	100%
(2)	No	0	0%
(3)	Not applicable	0	0%

22. In what capacity did you attend this course?

Answers to this question:

7

(1)	Doctoral student at KI or KI partner university	4	50%
(2)	Doctoral student at another university in Sweden	3	37.5%
(3)	Doctoral student at another university outside Sweden	0	0%
(4)	Postdoc at KI	0	0%
(5)	No answers	1	12.5%

Number of participants:	10
Number of answers:	8