| 1. The level of the course correlates with the description of the course (1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree). |
|
|
 |
|
| Number of participants: | 32 |
| Number of answers: | 30 |
| 1. The level of the course correlates with the description of the course (1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree). |
|
|
|
|
| 2. The intended learning outcomes (ILOs) of the course were adequately explained (1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree). |
|
|
|
|
| 3. There was a clear connection between the content, the intended learning outcomes as well as the examination of the course (1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree). |
|
|
|
|
| 4. The course design facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes (1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree). |
|
|
|
|
| 5. The examination was focused on understanding and/or application of knowledge (1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree). |
|
|
|
|
| 6. I achieved the intended learning outcomes (1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree). |
|
|
|
|
| 7. The teachers facilitated the achievement of the intended learning outcomes in an adequate way (1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree). |
|
|
|
|
| 8. How challenging was the course for you? For me the level of the course was: (1=too low; 7=too high) |
|
|
|
|
| 9. I have received relevant feedback during the course (1 = strongly disagree; 6= strongly agree). |
|
|
|
|
| 10. This course has fulfilled my expectations of what ought to be a doctoral education course of high quality (1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree). |
|
|
|
|
| 21. I would recommend this course to others enrolled in doctoral education |
|
|
|
|