2669 Nanotoxicology - potential risks of engineered nanomaterials to human health and the environment
Number of participants:  18
Number of answers:  16

1. The level of the course correlates with the description of the course
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 16 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 300%
chart 416.2%
chart 5956.2%
chart 6637.5%
  Mean value5.31
  Median5

graph

2. The intended learning outcomes (ILOs) of the course were adequately explained
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 16 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 316.2%
chart 4425%
chart 5318.8%
chart 6850%
  Mean value5.12
  Median5.5

graph

3. There was a clear connection between the content, the intended learning outcomes as well as the examination of the course
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 16 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 300%
chart 4318.8%
chart 5531.2%
chart 6850%
  Mean value5.31
  Median5.5

graph

4. The course design facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 16 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 300%
chart 4425%
chart 5425%
chart 6850%
  Mean value5.25
  Median5.5

graph

5. The examination was focused on understanding and/or application of knowledge
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 16 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 316.2%
chart 416.2%
chart 5637.5%
chart 6850%
  Mean value5.31
  Median5.5

graph

6. I achieved the intended learning outcomes
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 16 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 300%
chart 4425%
chart 5637.5%
chart 6637.5%
  Mean value5.12
  Median5

graph

7. The teachers facilitated the achievement of the intended learning outcomes in an adequate way
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 16 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 300%
chart 4425%
chart 5425%
chart 6850%
  Mean value5.25
  Median5.5

graph

8. How challenging was the course for you? For me the level of the course was:
(1=too low; 7=too high)
Answers to this question: 16 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 316.2%
chart 4637.5%
chart 5637.5%
chart 6318.8%
chart 700%
  Mean value4.69
  Median5

graph

9. I have received relevant feedback during the course
(1 = strongly disagree; 6= strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 16 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 316.2%
chart 4212.5%
chart 5425%
chart 6956.2%
  Mean value5.31
  Median6

graph

10. This course has fulfilled my expectations of what ought to be a doctoral education course of high quality
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 16 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 300%
chart 416.2%
chart 5637.5%
chart 6956.2%
  Mean value5.50
  Median6

graph

21. I would recommend this course to others enrolled in doctoral education
Answers to this question: 16 
chart(1)Yes16100%
chart(2)No00%
chart(3)Not applicable00%
  Mean value1.00
  Median1

graph