Biostatistics III -- Survival analysis for epidemiologists March 2015
Number of participants:  33
Number of answers:  26

1. The level of the course correlates with the description of the course
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 26 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 327.7%
chart 427.7%
chart 51246.2%
chart 61038.5%
  Mean value5.15
  Median5

graph

2. The intended learning outcomes (ILOs) of the course were adequately explained
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 26 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 300%
chart 4623.1%
chart 51246.2%
chart 6830.8%
  Mean value5.08
  Median5

graph

3. There was a clear connection between the content, the intended learning outcomes as well as the examination of the course
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 26 
chart 100%
chart 2415.4%
chart 327.7%
chart 4934.6%
chart 5623.1%
chart 6519.2%
  Mean value4.23
  Median4

graph

4. The course design facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 26 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 3311.5%
chart 41142.3%
chart 5726.9%
chart 6519.2%
  Mean value4.54
  Median4

graph

5. The examination was focused on understanding and/or application of knowledge
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 26 
chart 113.8%
chart 2415.4%
chart 3311.5%
chart 41038.5%
chart 5415.4%
chart 6415.4%
  Mean value3.92
  Median4

graph

6. I achieved the intended learning outcomes
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 26 
chart 113.8%
chart 213.8%
chart 327.7%
chart 4934.6%
chart 51038.5%
chart 6311.5%
  Mean value4.35
  Median4.5

graph

7. The teachers facilitated the achievement of the intended learning outcomes in an adequate way
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 26 
chart 100%
chart 213.8%
chart 313.8%
chart 41142.3%
chart 5726.9%
chart 6623.1%
  Mean value4.62
  Median4.5

graph

8. How challenging was the course for you? For me the level of the course was:
(1=too low; 7=too high)
Answers to this question: 26 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 313.8%
chart 4623.1%
chart 5934.6%
chart 6311.5%
chart 7726.9%
  Mean value5.35
  Median5

graph

9. I have received relevant feedback during the course
(1 = strongly disagree; 6= strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 26 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 3415.4%
chart 4934.6%
chart 51142.3%
chart 627.7%
  Mean value4.42
  Median4.5

graph

10. This course has fulfilled my expectations of what ought to be a doctoral education course of high quality
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 26 
chart 100%
chart 213.8%
chart 327.7%
chart 4415.4%
chart 51557.7%
chart 6415.4%
  Mean value4.73
  Median5

graph

22. I would recommend this course to others enrolled in doctoral education
Answers to this question: 26 
chart(1)Yes2492.3%
chart(2)No00%
chart(3)Not applicable27.7%
  Mean value1.15
  Median1

graph