2605 Brain development and neurodevelopmental disorders HT2015
Number of participants:  22
Number of answers:  14

1. The level of the course correlates with the description of the course
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 14 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 300%
chart 4214.3%
chart 5750%
chart 6535.7%
  Mean value5.21
  Median5

graph

2. The intended learning outcomes (ILOs) of the course were adequately explained
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 14 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 300%
chart 4428.6%
chart 5535.7%
chart 6535.7%
  Mean value5.07
  Median5

graph

3. There was a clear connection between the content, the intended learning outcomes as well as the examination of the course
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 14 
chart 100%
chart 217.1%
chart 300%
chart 4321.4%
chart 5321.4%
chart 6750%
  Mean value5.07
  Median5.5

graph

4. The course design facilitated achievement of the intended learning outcomes
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 14 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 300%
chart 4214.3%
chart 5750%
chart 6535.7%
  Mean value5.21
  Median5

graph

5. The examination was focused on understanding and/or application of knowledge
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 14 
chart 100%
chart 217.1%
chart 317.1%
chart 4321.4%
chart 5535.7%
chart 6428.6%
  Mean value4.71
  Median5

graph

6. I achieved the intended learning outcomes
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 14 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 300%
chart 4214.3%
chart 5642.9%
chart 6642.9%
  Mean value5.29
  Median5

graph

7. The teachers facilitated the achievement of the intended learning outcomes in an adequate way
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 14 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 300%
chart 417.1%
chart 51071.4%
chart 6321.4%
  Mean value5.14
  Median5

graph

8. How challenging was the course for you? For me the level of the course was:
(1=too low; 7=too high)
Answers to this question: 14 
chart 100%
chart 217.1%
chart 317.1%
chart 4642.9%
chart 5321.4%
chart 6214.3%
chart 717.1%
  Mean value4.50
  Median4

graph

9. I have received relevant feedback during the course
(1 = strongly disagree; 6= strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 14 
chart 117.1%
chart 217.1%
chart 3321.4%
chart 4214.3%
chart 5214.3%
chart 6535.7%
  Mean value4.29
  Median4.5

graph

10. This course has fulfilled my expectations of what ought to be a doctoral education course of high quality
(1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree).
Answers to this question: 14 
chart 100%
chart 200%
chart 317.1%
chart 4321.4%
chart 5750%
chart 6321.4%
  Mean value4.86
  Median5

graph

21. I would recommend this course to others enrolled in doctoral education
Answers to this question: 14 
chart(1)Yes1178.6%
chart(2)No00%
chart(3)Not applicable321.4%
  Mean value1.43
  Median1

graph